The Chicago Sky’s Struggles and the Reality for Angel Reese: Not Ready for WNBA Stardom—Yet

The Chicago Sky continued a painful spiral during their latest nationally televised blowout loss—a 30-point humiliation at home to the Phoenix Mercury that crystallized not just a bad game, but a season in crisis. Head coach Teresa Weatherspoon signaled public surrender, benching the starters mid-third quarter in an effort to spare both players and fans further embarrassment. Just 12 games in, the Sky sit 3-9, hold the WNBA’s worst defensive rating, and look less a team than a collection of mismatched, disconnected pieces. At the eye of this storm? Rookie sensation Angel Reese, whose growing pains are impossible to ignore.

The Reality Check: Hype vs. Performance

No rookie entered the 2024 season with more buzz than Angel Reese. An NCAA champion and social media phenomenon, she arrived with whole brands and networks ready to call her “the face of the next WNBA generation.” The problem? Professional basketball, at this level, is an unforgiving meritocracy.

Through a third of the season, Reese’s box scores paint a jarring contrast to her collegiate production. She is averaging just 9.1 points, a mere 6.8 rebounds, and two assists per game, while shooting a league-worst 30.9% from the field. The “Bayou Barbie” who built a reputation as the ultimate glass cleaner now finds her rebounding opportunities slashed (many of her college boards came off her own missed layups). Against the Mercury, Reese managed a “triple single”: nine points, two rebounds, two assists, and just one shot attempt in 24 minutes—to go with a minus-25 plus/minus.

It wasn’t an aberration; it’s becoming a trend.

Why the Team Is Suffering

On paper, this Sky roster was never a contender. The post-championship exodus of Chicago’s stars left a talent vacuum that no rookie, however hyped, could fill alone. Still, the lack of cohesion, effort, and leadership has surprised even the skeptics.

The Sky’s defense bleeds points—allowing 113.6 per 100 possessions, by far most in the league. Opponents average nearly 95 points per game and are shooting over 45% on three-pointers. The Sky haven’t held a single opponent under 90 in weeks. Meanwhile, with nearly 19 turnovers per game, Chicago’s offense is a masterclass in missed execution. These aren’t just growing pains—they’re signs of a team untethered to fundamentals.

Against Phoenix, the Sky trailed by 23 at halftime and 31–8 after a disastrous first quarter. The starters (including Reese and top rookie Camila Cardoso, who shined quietly with 17 efficient points) were benched early in the second half—not as a tactical reset, but a necessary embarrassment shield.

What’s Wrong with Angel Reese?

It’s not that Angel Reese lacks talent, charisma, or work ethic. She has all of those. But being “the face” of a league means more than Instagram buzz and endorsement deals—it means production, leadership, and a nightly reminder to teammates and fans that you set the standard.

Reese’s limitations have been ruthlessly exposed by WNBA defenses. She struggles to create shots against the league’s size and speed, can’t finish with the same frequency as in college, and, crucially, is not yet a vocal floor leader. In her own postgame comments, Reese projects maturity, humility, and a desire to improve—but her on-court impact hasn’t followed.

Leadership in the WNBA looks like A’ja Wilson, who dominates both ends and drags her team into contention even on bad nights. It looks like Breanna Stewart, who elevates teammates and anchors championship systems, or Caitlin Clark, who draws a crowd and maintains her resolve through physical play. Reese, meanwhile, was nearly invisible against the Mercury—speaking about hustle and trust, but not producing them.

Perception vs. Reality

The disconnect here is not just about stat lines, it’s about the messaging—internally and externally. National TV expects a show; instead, this game underscored everything the Sky are not. When Reese says, “I take accountability, I work every day,” no one doubts her intention, but words don’t erase the scoreboard.

When a team’s best hope for development is “trust the process,” but the process involves 30-point beatdowns, a reality check is overdue: Hard work must produce visible results in professional sports.

Is the Situation Salvageable?

Chicago’s problems are bigger than individual effort or attitude. Turnover issues are systemic. The perimeter defense is catastrophic. The offense is disjointed, and the chemistry almost non-existent—even the bench groups look lost. Perhaps most worrisome, no one on this roster, with the exception of Cardoso, looks untouchable. Coaching changes, roster shuffling, and even a front-office overhaul seem possible, if not likely.

For Reese, the immediate future is about development—fixing her finishing, learning pro-level defensive concepts, becoming a better passer, and finding ways to impact the game when her shot isn’t falling. For Chicago, it’s about survival: limiting blowouts, establishing identity, and giving young talent a stable environment to grow.

The Hard Truth for Angel Reese

Potential was enough to build college legend and national celebrity. It is not enough for the WNBA spotlight. At this moment, Angel Reese cannot be the face of the league—her play does not back up the branding. Headlining a franchise is about substance more than sizzle; about dragging a bad team to respectability, not vanishing in the losses.

That doesn’t mean the dream is over. Reese might one day be one of the league’s greats. She could become the leader, player, and winner that the WNBA promotes worldwide. For now, though, she and the Chicago Sky—and their fans—must come to grips with the work still required.

Until then, the spotlight belongs to players who get it done between the lines, not just behind a microphone.

In short: Angel Reese may be a star in the making. But tonight—and for the foreseeable future—she’s not ready to lead the WNBA. That’s the hard truth for her, for the Sky, and for a league that deserves only the best.

Full Video: